Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸¼ø±¸°³¿­È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ °ñ½ÅÀå¼úÀ» ÅëÇÑ »ó¾Ç°ñ ¿­¼ºÀåÀÇ Ä¡Çè·Ê

Distraction Osteogenesis for Maxillary Hypoplasia in a Cleft Patient

´ëÇѱ¸¼ø±¸°³¿­ÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 6±Ç 1È£ p.27 ~ 34
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁ¾·Ä º¯ÁØÈ£/Àå¿ø¼±/Á¤Å¿µ/¼Õ¿ì¼º

Abstract

º» ±³½Ç¿¡¼­´Â »ó¾Ç°ñÀÇ ¿­¼ºÀåÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ±¸¼ø±¸°³¿­È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ RED ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °ñ½ÅÀå¼úÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© »ó¾Ç°ñÀÇ Á¡ÁøÀûÀÎ Àü¹æÀ̵¿À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ°í ¾à 3³âÁ¤µµÀÇ Ã߽ñⰣÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â ÇöÀç±îÁö Ưº°ÇÑ ±â´É Àå¾Ö¾øÀÌ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ»ó, ÇϾǰü°è ¹× ¾È¸ð¸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â Áõ·Ê¸¦ ¹®Çå°íÂû°ú ÇÔ²² º¸°íÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.

Patients with maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate present numerous challenging problems for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon, These patients present with maxillary hypoplasia in multiclimensions, and often have thin or structually weak bone. This deformity has been traditionally corrected by Le Fort I osteotomy and acute skeletal advancement with wide surgical exposure. The long-term results of cleft patients with maxillary deficiency treated with this traditional approach has been sometimes disappointing, and an increased relapse tendency has been reported, Distraction osteogenesis for these cleft patients offers successful results while potentially minimizing the risk of relapse. Advancing the maxilla via distraction forces requires only a minor surgical procedure that maintains vascularity and neurosensory integrity. Moreover, the response of the facial soft tissues during maxillary distraction has proven to be more favorable than with a conventional LeFort I osteotomy. The purpose of this report is to present the use of maxillary distraction osteogenesis by rigid external distraction (RED) system for the treatment of patient with maxillary deficiency secondary to cleft lip and palate.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI